In short and translated:
1. Frank Schleck's defence presented a 20 pages document and the ALAD is going to respond it before the last date fixed for the 30th of January.
2. ALAD's 'conseil de discipline' presented its closing speech and it seems Frank's lawyers didn't find it very precise.
3. The problem is Frank must explain the presence in his body of a banned substance. The ammount of it is very very little and compatible with many causes, contamination included.
So... lets wait!